|
||||||||||||||||||
|
An Empirical Study
Prepared for
by
BACKGROUND
Many instruments, currently available on the market, purport
to entrain and balance the right and left hemispheres of the
brain, while simultaneously lowering its alpha rhythm. They
achieve these states by visual, kinetic, and/or electronic
stimulation of the cerebral cortex. On the other hand, the
BRAIN SUPERCHARGER is the first device to facilitate
whole-brain synchrony entirely through sound, thus
representing a major breakthrough in safe, inexpensive, and
potentially effective psychotechnology.
The question, of course, is whether this innovation delivers
what it promises. That is, does the BRAIN
SUPERCHARGER, as its name suggests, increase such
aspects of mental functioning as INTELLIGENCE,
ALERTNESS and EMOTIONAL STABILITY? And if
so, do these functions improve to a greater extent than they
would by listening to a recording of merely pleasant,
meditative music?
OBJECTIVES
With these considerations in mind, the present study was
designed to determine:
- The extent to which listening to the BRAIN
SUPERCHARGER is more psychologically effective than
listening to an identical “placebo” sound track.
- The “critical” psychological dimensions which the BRAIN
SUPERCHARGER alters.
- The effect of these “critical dimensions” on the overall
personality of people who listen to the BRAIN
SUPERCHARGER.
- The pattern of conscious responses to the BRAIN
SUPERCHARGER compared to that of a placebo tape.
These objectives were addressed through an empirical,
“double blind” experiment in which respondents believed
they were evaluating a new “meditation tape”.
Nevertheless, half the sample listened to an unmarked copy
of the BRAIN SUPERCHARGER (the “Experimental
Group”) while the other half listened to a “placebo” tape,
identical in every respect except for the absence of the
SUPERCHARGER technology (the “Control Group”). The
details of these methods are described in the following
section.
METHODS
This section discusses: 1) Sample; 2) Psychological
Measurements; and 3) Analysis of the Data used in the
study.
Sample
- Ryokan College (Los Angeles)
In addition, respondents were solicited on the street, by
fliers left under the windshield wipers of cars, and by
random mailings. This resulted in a sample, as of this
writing, of 52 respondents—a surprisingly large number
considering the two-week listening requirement and
associated daily questionnaires. (A cutoff date of
September 30, 1990 was set by PSI/Metrics for data
collection.)
Respondent Groups. Each respondent received an
unmarked “meditation tape” which he or she was asked to
use every day for two weeks. Of these, roughly half (58%)
were the BRAIN SUPERCHARGER, while the remainder
(42%) were PLACEBO tapes, identical to the
Supercharger in every way except for the underlying,
brain-synchrony sound track. Thus, any differences
between the SUPERCHARGER and PLACEBO groups
would be due primarily to the whole-brain technology
present in the former, but lacking in the latter.
Sample Demographics. Table 1, on the following page, is a
breakdown of the sample by its demographic
characteristics. It shows that our respondents, on the
average, are affluent ($54K a year), well educated (75%
post-graduate degrees), professional (90%
professional/managerial occupations) women and men (58%
and 42% respectively). Significantly, for the objectives of
this study, the vast majority are also religious, affiliated
primarily with the Eastern/New Age denominations (45%) in
which meditation plays such an important role. Moreover,
these characteristics, for the most part, are equally
represented in the SUPERCHARGER and PLACEBO
groups, once again suggesting that any differences between
them, after listening to their respective “meditation” tapes,
could only be due to the Supercharger soundtrack present
in one but not the other.
Psychological Measurements. A significant feature of this
study is its measurement of the personality structure of
respondents in the SUPERCHARGER and PLACEBO
groups both before and after listening to their unmarked,
“meditation” tapes for two weeks. This design permits us to
determine which psychological dimensions, if any, are
affected by the Supercharger technology to a greater extent
than its PLACEBO counterpart.
Personality Measurement. Respondents in both the
SUPERCHARGER and PLACEBO groups completed a
standardized psychological test before and after listening to
their tapes. This instrument, the “16PF”, was developed by
the renown psychologist, Dr. Raymond B. Cattell, and his
associates at the Institute for Personality and Ability Testing
in Champaign, Illinois.1 For the past forty years, it has
been the instrument of preference in studies of normal
personality functioning. In this regard, it has several
advantages. First, it was developed scientifically rather than
intuitively; secondly, it has different but parallel forms, thus
permitting uncontaminated “before” and “after”
measurements such as used in this study; third, it measures
a broad spectrum of personality dimensions, including
INTELLIGENCE, which may or may not be related to the
BRAIN SUPERCHARGER tape; and finally, a vast body
of psychological literature on the 16PF over the past forty
years has permitted the development of computer programs
for actuarial analysis of its profile results, the significance of
which will become clear later in this report. 2
TOTALSUPERCHARGERPLACEBO
GENDER
EDUCATION
OCCUPATION
RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE
The dimensions of personality measured by the 16PF are as
follows:
- Warmth
As indicated earlier, the psychological meaning of these
dimensions are described in Appendix B. At this point, it is
sufficient to note that any or all of them could be the “critical
factors” related to the impact of the BRAIN
SUPERCHARGER on its listeners.
Daily Listening Diary. In addition to completing the 16PF
before and after listening to their tapes, respondents in the
SUPERCHARGER and PLACEBO groups were asked to
complete the same “Daily Listening Diary” on each of the
fourteen days of their participation in the study (see
Appendix B). For each day, this specially designed
instrument measured the respondent’s:
- Reaction to the tape on that occasion
Thus, this instrument measured conscious reactions to the
SUPERCHARGER and PLACEBO tapes, while the 16PF
measured their unconscious influence, if any, on the
listener’s personality.
FINDINGS
The statistical findings of this study are presented under
three headings: 1) Individual Components Analysis; 2)
Actuarial Profile Analysis; and 3) daily Listening Diary
Analysis. The meaning of these will become clear when we
discuss them under later headings.
Individual Component Analysis. Table 2, on the following
page, shows the average scores on the 16PF before and
after listening to the SUPERCHARGER and PLACEBO
tapes. These differences were analyzed to determine which,
if any, are statistically significant. Briefly, “statistical
significance”, in this research context, means that the
difference between two average scores on the 16PF is
LARGE and STABLE enough to occur by chance factors
alone in 3 only 5 cases out of 100—i.e., the “.05 level of
confidence” universally accepted as “significant” in most
psychological research. These differences can be
summarized as follows:
STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT CHANGES
Supercharger GroupPlacebo Group
Intelligence
TABLE 2
Psychological Impact of Supercharger and Placebo Tapes
AVERAGE 16PF SCORES
SUPERCHARGER GROUP (N=30)PLACEBO GROUP
*NOTE: This difference is statistically significant at or
beyond the .05 level of confidence previously described.
The fact that SELF-DISCIPLINE increases in both groups
(and, therefore, cancels each other out) is not surprising
since the requirement to listen to the tapes every day for two
weeks in itself could increase this dimension. On the other
hand, there are no other significant changes in the
PLACEBO group, while INTELLIGENCE,
EMOTIONAL STABILITY, and ALERTNESS improve
markedly among listeners to the SUPERCHARGER tape.
These findings strongly suggest that the SUPERCHARGER
technology does what it claims to do: that is, it provides the
human brain with a psychophysical “workout”, as it were,
that improves its mental functioning. Furthermore, a
PLACEBO tape—identical to the SUPERCHARGER in
every way respect except for its psychophysical
technology—has no such effect on its listeners and, in fact,
has little if any effect at all.
Profile Analysis
An obvious question, of course, is how do the psychological
gains a person realizes from listening to the
SUPERCHARGER tape alter his or her total personality?
Recent advances in computer technology have made
possible actuarial analyses of 16PF results. That is, the
profile for an individual or group can be interpreted in its
totality, rather than as a collection of individual scores. Just
such an actuarial analysis was conducted for the
SUPERCHARGER and PLACEBO groups, and the results
are reported below.
The Profiles. Figures 1 and 2 on the following pages
graphically represent the previous data in Table 2 from
which the actuarial analysis in Appendix C was made. As
discussed earlier, the SUPERCHARGER group showed
statistically significant gains in INTELLIGENCE,
EMOTIONAL STABILITY, ALERTNESS, and SELF
DISCIPLINE, while the PLACEBO group only increased
on the latter dimension. The question, however, is what do
these changes mean in terms of the overall psychology of
each type of respondent? That is, as mentioned earlier, who
do the psychological gains results from the
SUPERCHARGER tape translate into new personality
structures for its users? The Actuarial Analyses reported in
Appendix C answer this question.
Chi-Square Analysis. Before discussing them, however,
another analysis of Figures 1 and 2 is can be most
revealing. Putting aside, for the moment, the issue of each
dimension’s statistical significance (as described earlier), we
can look at the overall patterns they from before and after
exposure to the SUPERCHARGER and PLACEBO
tapes. That is, the question can be raised, “How many
personality dimensions show a positive increase of one or
more points in the SUPERCHARGER vs. PLACEBO
groups—and is this multi-dimensional difference statistically
significant, without reference to the significance of each of its
individual factors? Table 3, below, shows the results of this
procedure.
TABLE 3
DIRECTION OF CHANGE
Supercharger Profile10010
Placebo Profile437
TOTAL14317
The data in Table 3 suggest that SUPERCHARGER
listeners, on the average, experienced more positive changes
in personality than their PLACEBO counterparts. And,
indeed, this is the case. By applying the appropriate test of
statistical significance to this distribution3 , we find that the
differences between the two groups is significant at and
beyond the .05 level of confidence.4 Moreover, the actual
dimensions summarized in Table 3 are as follows:
TABLE 4
SUPERCHARGERPLACEBO
PositiveNegativePositiveNegative
IntelligenceBoldnessSensitivity
Thus, on an overall basis, SUPERCHARGER users appear
to become more Intelligent, Emotionally Stable, Serious,
Sensitive, Imaginative, Alert, Self-Sufficient, Disciplined,
Relaxed, and “hand loose”. PLACEBO listeners, on the
other hand, while becoming more bold, imaginative,
experimenting and self-disciplined also become less
sensitive, secure, and relaxed. And finally, these
differences, on an overall basis, are statistically significant in
favor of the SUPERCHARGER experience.
Actuarial Analysis. Turning now to yet another level of
analysis, the psychological scores in Figures 1 and 2 were
submitted to a computer interpretation developed by Dr.
Bruce Duthie. (See Appendix C for the results of this
procedure.) This shows that both groups were
unremarkable in their personality structures before listening
to their respective tapes. That is, they were solidly average
in their overall, pre-exposure personalities. What emerges
as significant, however, is that the PLACEBO group
remained average after listening to its tape, while the
SUPERCHARGER group showed marked changes in its
overall personality structure.
The Supercharger Effect. How do the four psychological
dimensions effected by the SUPERCHARGER tape alter
the overall personality of its listeners? The computer reports
in Appendix C answer this question. Compared to the
PLACEBO group, whose reactions remain essentially the
same, the SUPERCHARGER listeners, as a result of its
psychotechnology, experience a “high morale”, also
“persevering under difficult circumstances.” They become
“more efficient” and “insightful” as well as “quick learning
and intellectually adaptable.” Moreover, listening to the
SUPERCHARGER promotes “better than average
judgment” and an “imaginative inner life”. The “intuitive”
and “feeling” functions also increase, along with a deepened
concern for “theory, art, philosophy and other abstract
interests.” On the other hand, a certain amount of
“impracticality” accompanies these interests, but these are
compensated for by an “independent, resourceful and
self-sufficient” point of view which results in the
SUPERCHARGER listener “making his own decisions
when at all possible”.
The Daily Listening Diary. Respondents were asked to
complete the “Daily Diary” in Appendix B. The results of
their entries are shown in Table 4 on the following page.
These data show that the overwhelming difference between
the PLACEBO and SUPERCHARGER groups was that
the former was “agitated”, “restless” and “put to sleep”,
while the latter had a more “peaceful” “spiritual” and
“hallucinatory” experience. As one experienced meditator,
a male member of the Hindu religion put it (See Appendix E
for other typical comments):
“[I] felt an incredible lightness of body & mind. My mind
traveled up and out, beyond the limits of the world. Almost
an out-of-body experience. Felt very peaceful for some
time after.”
(Respondent No. 47)
TABLE 5
PERCENT
RESPONSE
Relaxing/Peaceful/Soothing24%27%20%
Reaction to the PLACEBO tape, on the other hand, was
more negative. In the words of one participant, also and
experienced meditator:
“[I felt] agitation, disgust. Wished it to be over soon.”
(Respondent No. 11)
Thus, on an objective basis, as well as a subjective level,
reactions to the SUPERCHARGER tape were more
favorable than those of the PLACEBO.
DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
The findings of this study are sufficiently clear to suggest
several important conclusions about the
SUPERCHARGER. These are discussed below, first in
general and then in terms of their marketing implications.
General Conclusions
To begin with, it appears that the BRAIN
SUPERCHARGER “works.” That is, it does what its name
implies it does: daily usage seems to have a profound effect
on the mental functioning of its listener, increasing his or
her...
- INTELLIGENCE
Conversely, a comparable group of people, exposed for the
same period of time to a PLACEBO tape—?identical in
every respect except that it lacked the SUPERCHARGER
technology — showed essentially no changes at all.
These psychological gains from the SUPERCHARGER, in
turn, translate into increased judgment, greater creativity, a
broader occupation outlook, and a generally more relaxed
view of life—as indicated by an actuarial profile analysis of
the data. Once again, the PLACEBO group showed no
such modifications in their personalities. Instead, they found
their tape “agitating” and “annoying” causing their mind to
wander and making them “restless.”
Marketing Implications. In conclusion, the BRAIN
SUPERCHARGER appears to alter the personality of its
users in essentially positive and life-enhancing ways.
Therefore, although not “therapy” it is therapeutic. Its
impact on EMOTIONAL STABILITY, as noted earlier, an
essential factor in the ego strength of normally functioning
men and women, testifies to this fact.
These findings correspond nicely with the growing trend
toward short-term and/or “self-help” psychotherapy. The
traditional models of extended, one-on-one counseling are
giving way to new and innovative technologies -- including
even computerized psychotherapy—and it might do well to
position its product somewhere along that trend, as
indicated below.
Mental Health Professionals. In such a marketing effort, the
EST model should be kept in mind. That is, the service
offered is “therapeutic” without claiming to be therapy.
Within that context, the BRAIN SUPERCHARGER could
be offered to mental health professionals as an adjunct to,
rather than a replacement for, counseling and
psychotherapy. For example, mailing lists of its members
are available from the American Psychological Association
and a mail campaign, including reprints of this report, could
be directed to them.
The General Public. Among the general public, the BRAIN
SUPERCHARGER could be positioned as...
THE MOST POWERFUL TOOL FOR
This, or some similar positioning, would capitalize on the
SUPERCHARGER’s capacity for enhancing the
personality, as suggested by this study, while avoiding any
claims as a replacement for professional treatment.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| ©1999-2003 Zygon. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy/Terms Of Use. | ||||||||||||||||||